Tuesday, August 20, 2019
Discuss the Role of the Inspector in An Inspector Calls Essay -- An In
  Birlings, he controls the development of events: who will speak and  when; who may or may not leave; who will or will not see the  photograph. He even Priestley describes the Inspector, when he first  appears on stage, in terms of 'massiveness, solidity and  purposefulness' (p.11), symbolizing the fact that he is an unstoppable  force within the play. His 'disconcerting habit of looking hard at the  person he addresses before speaking' (p.11) gives the impression that  he sees through surface appearances to the real person beneath. It  also gives him a thoughtfulness that contrasts with the  thoughtlessness of each character's treatment of the girl.  His role in the play is not simply to confront each character with the  truth, but to force each character to admit the truth they already  know. He works methodically through the characters present one at a  time, partly because he recognizes that 'otherwise, there's a muddle'  (p.12), and partly because, given the chance, the characters are all  quick to defend each other, or to call upon outside help (such as  Colonel Roberts) in order to avoid accepting the truth of what he  suggests.    He arrives just after Birling has been setting out his views of life:  that every man must only look out for himself. The Inspector's rule is  to show that this is not the case. Throughout the play he demonstrates  how people are responsible for how they affect the lives of others;  his views are summed up in his visionary and dramatic final speech:  that 'we are members of one body. We are responsible for each other'  (p.56). Responsibility is one of the play's two key themes, and the  Inspector is Priestley's vehicle for putting across his own views of  this as a socialist. In this final speec...              ...led as both an alcoholic and a thief.    After the Inspector has gone, Birling simply wants things to return to  the way they were. He cannot understand Sheila's and Eric's insistence  that there is something to be learnt, and he is relieved and  triumphant when he feels that scandal has been avoided and everything  is all right. Right up until the end, he claims that 'there's every  excuse for what both your mother and I did - it turned out  unfortunately, that's all' (p.57).    Birling is not the cold and narrow-minded person that his wife is; he  simply believes in what he says. He is a limited man, who is shown to  be wrong about many things in the play; it is the Birlings of the  world whom Priestley feared - in 1945 - would not be willing or able  to learn the lessons of the past, and so it is to the younger  generation that Priestley hopefully looked instead...                      
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.