At the beginning of both versions, the audience hear the prologue Essay Example

At the beginning of both versions, the audience hear the prologue Essay In Baz Lhurmanns version we hear the prologue, which is read by a newsreader in a small television frame in which the camera is zooming into. Whereas in Franco Zeffirellis version the audience only hear the prologue and see a misty and cloudy sky of Verona, which tells the audience that there is trouble brewing. Then in Baz Lhurmanns version the audience see over 40 quick clips of the play, in the form of a roller coaster. This symbolises adrenaline in your body and how quickly the tragedy occurs, after this happens Lhurmann chooses to have freeze frames on each character of the play. When he shows the audience Lord Capulet, he shows police sirens on his face that tell the audience that he is involved in a lot of violence. Both directors show the difference both families. In Baz Lhurmanns version the Montague boys and Capulet boys have different symbols to show the different gangs in Verona. Whereas in Zeffirellis version both families are represented by the colour clothes that they wear. In Lhurmanns version the first time the audience see Tybalt; it is in a petrol station as soon as he comes out of his car there is silence and he lights a cigarette. This shows that he has power. As he comes out of his car, the audience get a close up of his eyes. The audience also see the waistcoat that he wears, it has Jesus all over it to show that he doesnt care about religion, and he smiles and so the audience get a view of his braces. The waistcoat is part of dramatic irony as later the audience will see that although theres religion he doesnt think to kill some one is a sin. We see a close up of his brace in which Sin is written on it. Its as thought he is a walking oxymoron. At this point we can hear a western theme music that is getting louder and he stands in a position that shows he is ready to fight. He then takes two guns out of his pocket. We then see a close up of his gun is says 9mm. Suddenly we see a slow motion clip of him dropping his cigarette and this is the poin t that he pulls the trigger to spark the feud. Once the cigarette falls to the ground we see a big fire that starts to burn. We see the smoke fill the sky to show the trouble has begun. Now both families start to shoot one another. We see a gunshot that hits the sign on the petrol station that says add fuel to the fire. We then see some nuns that come in the picture and we hear people screaming this is symbolic of the innocence in Verona and all of this takes place during the day; so this shows that theres not only violence during the night but also during the day. We will write a custom essay sample on At the beginning of both versions, the audience hear the prologue specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on At the beginning of both versions, the audience hear the prologue specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on At the beginning of both versions, the audience hear the prologue specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer This whole scene is symbolic as Tybalt is the main character that adds fuel to the feud and this scene takes place in a petrol station. But in Zeffirellis version the families meet in a busy open market. Its all hustle and bustle. In his version the character are chattier, laughing and joking around. But in Lhurmanns version the characters are really serious and angry. In Zeffirellis version, just before the fight, Tybalt arrives at the scene and we get a view of him walking towards the audience. When they start to fight a bell starts to ring to tell the people of Verona that there is a fight about to happen. When they start fighting its not only the families but the whole city gets involved in the fight, its more like a celebration and so its makes the audience think that the whole of Verona is involved with the violence of the feud. The camera starts to flick around everywhere to show the confusion, as everyone is involved in the fight. Again like in Lhurmanns version Zeffrelli has shown innocent people by showing a mother and baby right in the middle of the fighting and again like Lhurmann, Zeffrelli has shown the fighting during daylight. Then in both versions a prince stops the fighting. In Lhurmanns version the prince arrives in a helicopter and so the helicopter breaks all other sounds and so we can hear only the helicopter. But in Zeffirellis version when the prince arrives we hear a fanfare to symbolise that royalty is coming. In Lhurmanns version the prince has all the power and both families are silent and we see a quick view of one family to another. The prince emphasises on ALL ARE PUNISHED. Then we hear some peaceful and calm music, to show that the fight it over and its like the calm after the storm. Then in Lhurmanns version once this is over we get an overview of harsh Verona, how busy life really is in an urban city. We also see how busy it is and how sleazy it is as well. The audience see prostitutes during the day. The first time we see Romeo in both versions there is a hole behind him this show that he is still incomplete. Lhurmanns shows a stark contrast of Verona because Romeo is near the sea, which is suppose to be nice and peaceful which in contrast We get contrast flicks of the busy and chaotic and sleaziness of the city life. That is full of 20th century icons such as police, guns and violence. Romeo is shown to be in a playground that has rides; this is symbolic to say that Romeo is still a little kid. While he is speaking the camera is going round and round in a spinning motion to show his confusion. Whereas in Zeffirellis version when Romeo comes the audience hear soft, float music to that he is dreaming and not seeing the true light. But in this version Zeffirelli has chosen to cut out the part when Romeo speaks in oxymorons, but to show this he has chosen to show Romeo lying down to tell the audience of the heaviness. Finally in Lhurmanns version the audience get another glimpse of the violence that fills Verona. The audience see a news bulletin of the violence that occurred in the petrol station a couple of hours ago. But in Zeffirellis version the opening scene end with the dead bodies that lay on the ground after the fighting with sad and slow music. So in the opening scene; both Lhurmann and Zeffirelli has concentrated on using Elizabethan language, but in Lhurmanns version the lines are more aggressive in contrast to the peaceful lines spoken by the characters in Zeffirellis version. In the closing scenes the directors of both films have demonstrated things in completely different ways. Lhurmanns version is set inside a church. At the beginning we can only hear the heavy breathing of Romeo but we dont actually see his face as he is standing in the dark. Its as though he is scared to come in the true light and see what has actually happened. Then he slowly comes in to the picture and we then see a clear close up of his face. Then suddenly we see a high angle view of the church and the audience can see bright lights in the way of a path. Lhurmann has chosen to set the light out to show that its Romeo final walk to face his destiny. As Romeo walks slowly towards Juliets tomb there is depressing opera music that seems to get louder as he get closer to Juliets tomb. This music is building up tension. As soon as he reaches Juliets tomb the music finally stops. He then slowly gets a ring out from his pocket and places it on Juliets ring finger. He puts a ring on her finger as it is round so it symbolises that they can be together forever without any obstacles in their way. The first time the audience see Juliet she is dressed in a white dress with white flowers. The audience see Juliet holding a flower in her hand to show that she is innocent as a bud. This shows that she is innocent and pure and is symbolic as it shows that she is ready to marry Romeo. Whereas in Zeffirellis version the final scene also takes place in a church but the audience also see the dead body of Tybalt who is next to Juliet. Zeffirelli has chosen that the final moment between Romeo and Juliet cannot be between them but he wants to show how close love and hate is. Whereas in contrast to Lhurmanns version he has chosen that the final scene between Romeo and Juliet has to be between them and so no one can interrupt their final moment together and to get this effect the audience get a lot of close up of the faces of Romeo and Juliet to show its only between them. In Lhurmanns version Romeo whispers words in Juliets ear which is a contrasted with the opening scene when the words are shouted this shows that he is only talking to her and not the to rest of Verona. While this is happening the audience get a high angle shot so its like the audience are peeping on their intimate scene. During this scene we see a lot of close up of the eyes to show that they are seeing the true light for the first time. Before Romeo actually drinks the poison he keeps stroking her hair and holds her hand to show that he is really close to her. Finally Romeo has the poison in his and then kisses Juliet for the last time. At he kisses Juliet we see a shot of her hand moving but by this time Romeo has already drank the poison. The tension is built up by the silence as Juliet is gaining the energy to get up. By now Romeo is dieing, he is helpless and destroyed and says his final words in Juliets hands. Even though in his play Shakespeare hasnt shown that Juliet awakens Lhurmann has shown this to show what a tragedy this is; just because of one second both Romeo and Juliet are doomed. Once Romeo is dead, then there are a couple of seconds silence as Juliet is taking in what has happens and then suddenly the silence is broken by really loud crying from Juliet which echos through the whole church, this also shows that the church is empty. Then slowly she gets the gun from Romeos pocket and looks at it. The camera focuses on it and zooms up to were it says 9mm. Its the same as Tybalts gun at the petrol station. The audience then hear a clear loud gunshot. The loud sound takes the audience by surprise and makes them shudder. The audience then hear silence. But in Zeffirellis version we see Romeo holding a torch in his hand, as the church is really old, gloomy and dark. The audience hear slow, soft music as he walks in the church. In this version we see Juliets body in a white sheet that also covers her face. When Romeo gets to her body the first things he does is that he lifts the veil of her face. This shows that that was the last barrier before they can be together. Just like they are getting married. Romeo then starts to cry and the audience only hear him and no other sounds. Whereas in Lhurmanns version the music shows the grief. Then just like the other version he drink the poison. But this time Juliet doesnt wake up. But once Romeo is lying on the ground Juliet slowly awakens. As soon as she wakes up she Romeo dead body this is when we see a close up of her eyes as now she is seeing the true light. Then unlike Lhurmanns version the Friar comes in. Juliet then asked the Friar for Romeo. But she hasnt seen him lying on the ground. The Friar looks stunned and scared and looks to the ground. Thats when Juliet realises that Romeo is dead. We then hear some dogs coming and the Friar begins to panic. He tries to take Juliets hand but she doesnt want to go and so the friar leaves Juliet in the church. In this version we hear her heavy, passionate and frantic breathing that is in the same pace as the music; both are speeding up. Again in this version we see Juliet looking at the dagger and then a close up of her eyes, this shows that again in this version she is accepting her fate. But in this version her stabbing is more violent. We actually see the dagger going inside her, and then the reality is shown by the expression on her face. So then in both versions both Romeo and Juliet are on then floor close to each other. In Lhurmanns version Juliets hand falls on Romeos stomach, this shows that they look like they are peacefully asleep. Whereas in Zeffirellis version the audience dont actually see whether Juliets body falls on Romeo but they hear a sound that seems it does. Then in Lhurmanns version the audience see really quick flashbacks of Romeo and Juliets best moments together and then the final scene of Juliet on Romeos body to show that finally they are together in peace. Then both directors have decided to show the funeral. They have shown that the bodies are covered in black and white cloths. This is symbolic as Romeo was wrapped in black because he didnt see true light and Juliet was wrapped in white to show that she was pure. In Zeffirellis version we only can hear the sound of bells and it look like a proper death march. In both versions the directors show both families together and everybody is quiet. This shows that the long old feud is over and shown the two families unity. Finally in both versions we hear the prince who once again has all the power. He emphasises on the price both families had to pay because of the long old feud. We also get close ups of both families as the prince is speaking. Lastly in Lhurmanns version the audience again see the little television screen with the newsreader. But this time the news is about the death of Romeo and Juliet and to finish the film the camera zooms out from the television which in contrast to the beginning where it zooms in on the little television. Both directors have interpreted Romeo and Juliet in the best possible way they can. Lhurmann has concentrated on the love between Romeo and Juliet because he thought a lot of people would be put off by the language, so he add more actions, more music and more pictures. Whereas Zeffirelli has concentrated more on the language Shakespeare has used and showed the fact that it is a tragedy. Because of the time difference between both films there have been many changes. Zeffirelli chose to set his film in a Medieval and old theme, as it is clear of the setting and time as the violence was without modern day weapons but with swords. In contrast to Lhurmanns modern city version where a lot of guns are used. Lhurmann has tried to show how much Hollywood, the camera techniques, technology and music has changed. Throughout the whole play Franco Zeffirelli has only use one single track by Nino Rotas and changed the pace but to get the effect of music effecting our emotions, Baz Lhurmann has used a verity of music from Urban to Opera. Throughout the play Lhurmanns has edited many scenes to make them blend together and so the scene flows together. Both directors have concentrated on different things to get the point across. Zeffirelli has concentrated more on Shakespeares language whereas Lhurmann has concentrated more on the love between Romeo and Juliet. Although Zeffirelli has concentrated on Shakespeares language h has decided to cut out the part when Romeo speaks in oxymorons but to show his heaviness Romeo just lies down on his own. Lhurmann has decided to show Jesus looming over all the action, as throughout the play the audience get constant flicks of the statue of Jesus. Its like he is looking down on all the violence but cant do anything about it. He has chosen that the film slots into any time period, as it is timeless. So people in any era will understand the dialogue. Whereas Zeffirelli has concentrated on Shakespeares language so only people from that era will understand it, as Shakespeares language is quiet hard to understand. The characters that both directors chose caused some controversy. Lhurmann chose Leonardo Di Caprio to star as Romeo as he thought that he looks like a young, innocent boy, and Juliet as Clair Danes. He chose her as she was an unknown star, and so Lhurmann wanted the public to only know her as Juliet and not Clair. But Zeffirelli chose both actors who were unknown. This is what caused the controversy. As the people of those times didnt know whom the actors were. Romeo was casted by Leonard Whiting and Juliet casted by Olivia Hussey. Although he used unknown characters the film received 4 academy nominations and made over $48 million dollars at the box office.

Vietnam Draftees essays

Vietnam Draftees essays The Vietnam War was the subject matter of many debates during the 1960s and the 1970s. War advocates and anti-war activists voiced their opinions all throughout the nation about our countrys involvement in Vietnam. People from all walks of life spoke out about the war, from politicians to hippies, making it clear that everyone had their own view on the war, although, not everyone agreed with one another on the decisions and outcomes that were made for our country. Demonstrations and rallies were being held everywhere, from the White House to the streets, either supporting or protesting Americas involvement in the Vietnam War. One of the main causes of debate came from the issue of drafting Americans into the war whether or not they chose to go into battle in Vietnam. People felt strongly about the issue because those who were drafted were forced to leave behind whatever future they had planned for themselves to fight for their country. Activists were against the idea since they felt that American involvement in Vietnam was inadequate in helping end the war and they felt the United States was involved for the wrong reasons. Others felt that it was our duty as Americans to serve in the war. Regardless of what your attitudes were towards the war, many others felt the same way and shared an equal point of view, therefore, those who strongly followed their beliefs were the ones to speak out and educate others about their perspectives. Among those who voiced their opinions were such Americans as Tim OBrien, an army veteran who served in Vietnam, Spiro T. Agnew, the vice president to Richard Nixon, and John F. Kerry, also a Vietnam veteran and the former lieutenant governor of Massachusetts. These men all carry different attitudes towards the subject of drafting and the ethics of complying or evading the draft. Although each activist supported a different position on the subject, good arguments were m...